Book Review - Little Women

                                                    LITTLE WOMEN
                                                 By Louisa May Alcott

This was a delightful book from start to finish. The fact that I thought so and commented on what a happy book it was surprised my daughter who had other memories of reading it and there being some moments where she expected me to cry. I began to wonder if we had read two different books - I did some research and found that we had and we hadn't. The version that I read was a copy of the original book, first published in 1868 which was intended to be a Happy Ever after stand alone novel. As the book did so well Alcott's publisher pestered her for a sequel - in 1869 that sequel, called Good Wives, was published. Over here the two books continued as separate editions whilst in America they were combined under the one title of Little Women. My daughter read the combined version, hence our different experiences.

Little Women is set during the American Civil War and focuses on the lives of the March sisters. Their father is away serving as a pastor in the war and they and their mother struggle a little to make ends meet. They do, however, have plenty of love and positive attitudes and their adventures are a joy to read. The lives of the girls are explored through a series of events and celebrations and are compared with the lonely Laurie who lives next door with his wealthy grandfather and how a friendship is built between the two families.

The characters are a delight - shy Beth, tomboy Jo, beautiful Meg and little Amy all grow and learn in this story. Even when they go wrong they are brought back, forgiven and learn from their experiences. As I said before I found it to be a delightful book filled with happiness and fun. Now I am undecided about reading Good Wives. I loved this one but apparently the sequel will make me cry and a little frustrated.

So should you read it?
9/10 - an absolute joy (but if you read the combined version instead, don't blame me if it isn't as happy as you expected)

The Scottish Play

Last night I went to see a live screening of Macbeth from the RSC. I had been looking forward to it for weeks. It is one of my favourite plays, it had two super actors in the lead roles. I just couldn't wait.

When the production actually came I was sadly disappointed. I have read social media reviews and many people were, some leaving the screening in the interval - but some absolutely loved it, which made me think why there would be such differing views. For me Christopher Eccleston played angry Christopher Eccleston - but does that just mean that I know the actor too well and cannot disassociate him from other roles? He was angry throughout and I could feel no sympathy whatsoever for the character. This I found hard because a small part of me always feels a little sorry for Macbeth and the path he took. Niamh Cusack for me was far too emotional and overblown throughout. The madness scene was very good but, in my opinion, she played the emotion too strong from the beginning. For me Lady Macbeth is one of the strongest characters who eventually descends into madness when that strength fails her. I didn't see the strength in this play. One of the main parts of Macbeth for me is the love shared between the two main characters - this did not come across in this production. The devastation felt by Macbeth at his wife's death wasn't there, there was still just a lot of anger. I also struggled with the witches being played by small children with dolls. I didn't feel any of the malevolence I usually associate with the characters. I did love the Porter's role. He was hilarious. MacDuff and Banquo were finely played. The countdown clock that only made sense to me at the end was an inspired idea.

So what was so wrong for me, when obviously there are people who have enjoyed it? I have thought about that all morning. I have come to the conclusion that is is because I know the play too well. I studied it for O level and then I studied it again for A level, that was when I went down to Stratford to see it for the first time - a wonderful production, but then it was my first one. I have seen it many times since then. My favourite being Kenneth Branagh in the Manchester production a few years ago. For my daughter it is the David Morrissey version at the Liverpool Everyman, which I think was her first Macbeth. This is where my problem lies - I have read, studied and seen it so many times that my view of the play and the characters is entrenched. I go to productions with preconceptions and that was my problem last night. I knew what I expected and that wasn't it. Every director wants to put their own stamp on a play and different interpretations are good. We cannot endlessly repeat the same performances.

Last night's play was not for me. I felt the same with the last Midsummer Night's Dream I saw though. Maybe it's time I stopped going to see my favourite plays and started going to plays I know less well. I absolutely loved the NT Othello - that was a play I have only read once. Perhaps that is the answer - new plays which I can approach without preconceptions.

Book Review - Fingers in the Sparkle Jar

                                                      FINGERS IN THE SPARKLE JAR
                                                                        A Memoir
                                                                  by Chris Packham

This was an interesting book to read. It is filled with personal reminiscences of a childhood spent with nature and books. The author's love for wildlife shines through. It is an honest memoir that doesn't gloss over the upsetting side of nature or things you do as an interested child that you may frown upon as an adult.

The book also deals with how the author struggled to fit in as a child (he was diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome as an adult) and eventually retreated into his own world. A fine world of nature. I found myself frequently angry with people who won't accept someone who doesn't fit into a box they regard as 'normal'.

I struggled a little with the way the memoir was set out - a tale from 1978 may be followed by one from 1974, then one from 1968 and one from 2004. This I feel says more about me than the book. I like things organised and chronological. That is just one of my foibles. The thing is the book is a memoir. If I was sitting telling a friend about my childhood I would probably tell it in the same way a story from when I was 9, then when I was 7, then I'd remember a tale from my teens etc.

In this book are many childhood tales of collecting, watching, caring for and exploring to find out more. Not all pleasant tales. The love and encouragement of his parents shines throughout.

As well as tales of nature Chris also talks about his battle with depression through memoirs of meetings with a therapist. This is a totally open and honest memoir and I can understand why it was loved so much by Winterwatch viewers.

So should you read it?

8/10 An interesting and thought provoking book. Even if you're not a great reader, this is set out in a series of short reminiscences which makes it ideal to dip into in your lunch breaks. I'm sure that you'll be glad you did.

Stationery

You all know how much I love books but another of my favourite things is stationery. I have a wonderful collection of it, some of which is in the photograph above. Whenever my children need something for school or university, before they get to "Mum have you got....?", they know that I will have it in a box or a drawer somewhere.

Next to book shops my favourite place to visit is a stationers. I can feel the excitement build as I walk in. I have never lost it from childhood. In my teens I used to love shopping in Blacklers Bargain Basement where you could buy everything seperately. I would have multicoloured paper and envelopes that didn't match, scissors that cut in different patterns, stampers,staplers, holepunches and I would rush home to write letters and use them all.

My favourite time at school was the first day of a new term when I arrived with my bag filled with new pens, pencils, rulers, erasers etc. I loved the feel and smell of the new books. I especially liked the fact that they were perfect. I had a whole new start without any crossings out, ink blots or work marked wrong and they were going to stay that way all year, Of course they never did but I still had the same hopes the first day of the next new school year.

That September excitement still stays with me now. The beginning of autumn always makes me want to go out and buy new stationery. So I rush out to Paperchase, W H Smith and that lovely art shop by the Blue Coat Chambers and I stock up. I don't actually know what I am stocking up for but I stock up anyway.

My house is filled with notebooks with records and lists that I've made, my cupboards are filled with lists - jobs for the day, week, month - feel good activities for each month- weight loss targets - menus for the week, all multicoloured and ticked off with highlighters. Don't laugh, it makes me feel content.

I still have a collection of fountain pens. Nothing writes as well as a fountain pen. I love my fountain pens. I think it stems back to handwriting lessons at school where you were not allowed to progress from pencil to fountain pen until your handwriting was up to scratch. I progressed to fountain pen, it was a big achievement and so I still want to write with a fountain pen. I still think the move to biros at the local comprehensive school was a bad move. My presentation was never as good.

You've probably gathered that I am a total Luddite. I have a selection of writing paper, stickers and pencils for writing proper letters. I got out of the habit for a while with the advent of email but I was never excited to receive an email from anyone. I have a friend who sends me proper letters and, as they come through my letter box, for my excitement she may as well have sent me the crown jewels (which incidentally I wouldn't be excited about at all). This year I put 'write a real letter' on my monthly feel good activities list. I have a whole host of new stationery - pens, pencils and stickers to do this with and I am loving writing proper letters again.

This year when we go on our summer holidays, besides my books, my stationery is going with me. I shall write letters, draw sketches of places we visit and colour in my lovely colouring books. It may not be cool but it's me. My Mum always told me that everyone is different and that's what makes the world such an interesting place. As I have gotten older I have realised she was right and these days I'm just me and I accept other people for being them, even if they don't like stationery.

Book Review 'A Brief History of Time' by Stephen Hawking

                                               A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME

                                            From The Big Bang to Black Holes

                                                   by Stephen W. Hawking

This is a book I have picked up many times and never started because I thought Mr Hawking was far too clever for me. I finally picked it up a few weeks ago and actually read it.

I was very pleasantly surprised. Stephen Hawking writes with humour and  clear, detailed explanations. He puts things in a way that are understandable and as simple as physics can be. I found myself reading it and saying 'Ah, that makes sense now' or 'I never knew that, but it's so interesting'

There are clear diagrams to explain theories so people like me can follow the ideas. I make no claim to be able to explain more than a third of it now. It made sense as I read it but I haven't retained all the information. I was poor at science at school and am only just beginning to pick up more science books, mainly to keep up with my physics obsessed son. I intend to reread this book next year, a more updated version next time - this was a first reprint and some ideas, I believe, have been updated since.

I am far more aware of how the galaxy has expanded, how what happened before the Big Bang is not relevant to our understanding of the universe, how black holes are created and I know to be be sure to never travel close to one and be spaghettified! The Unified Theory  I actually thought had been found, though I didn't really know what it was prior to reading this book. There were many terms I had heard but hadn't much idea about. I found out a lot as I read this book and was delighted to find easier explanations of things that have always bamboozled me. There is only one equation in the whole book - which for me was great  as I struggle with them - something else I'm working on. In the introduction Mr Hawking actually states that someone told him that each equation included in the book would halve his sales. They obviously knew people like me.

This book has renewed my interest in physics and made me ready to revisit Carl Sagan's Cosmos too. And to start on more Feynman.

So - should you read it?

10/10 - a superb book with clear, detailed explanations of the cosmos, written with humour and intelligence